# Llama 13b vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where QwQ-32B leads 50.9 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 344 | 153 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1326 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 137.6 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1323 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or QwQ-32B better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and QwQ-32B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.