# Llama 13b vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.8 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 46.0 |
| Rank | 348 | 68 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1482 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1593 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 47.5% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1460 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | 149.38 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 42.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1456 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1482 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1271 |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1504 |
| LMArena French | — | 1465 |
| LMArena German | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1450 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1384 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1441 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.8 27B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.