# Llama 13b vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.5 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 344 | 66 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1460 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 147.39 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1459 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.