# Llama 13b vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 27.3 to 13.4.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 344 | 152 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.