# Llama 13b vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 348 | 71 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1487 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1483 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1474 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.