# Llama 13b vs Qwen3.5-9B

> Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 35.3 to 20.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 344 | 235 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 139.45 |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.5-9B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.