# Llama 13b vs Qwen3.5 27B

> Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen3-5-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 59.3 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 41.9 |
| Rank | 348 | 127 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1427 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1358 |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 349.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 201.98 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1414 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1429 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1241 |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1410 |
| LMArena German | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1393 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1410 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.5 27B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.