# Llama 13b vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 53.1 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 344 | 166 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1335 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 138.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3 32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3 32B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.