# Llama 13b vs Qwen2-72B

> Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2-72B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 40.8 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 348 | 300 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | 125.28 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 47.7% | 82.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen2-72B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1192 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1196 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Qwen2-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen2-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.