# Llama 13b vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 41.6 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 348 | 245 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | 83% |
| WinoGrande | 73% | 80.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1251 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | 93% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | 70.5% |
| MMLU | 47.7% | 79.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 22.6 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.