# Llama 13b vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 54.4 to 36.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 344 | 270 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1107 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1066 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1080 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 47.7% | 62.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1061 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen1.5-7B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.