# Llama 13b vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.4 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 344 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen Plus share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.