# Llama 13b vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

> Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-phi-3-medium-4k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 57.6 to 36.7.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 348 | 250 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1130 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1127 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1173 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1110 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1113 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1120 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.