# Llama 13b vs phi-3-medium 14B

> phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.3 to 20.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 344 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | 73% | 81.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | 91.6% |
| MMLU | 47.7% | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | 73.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than phi-3-medium 14B?

phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and phi-3-medium 14B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.