# Llama 13b vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 348 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1319 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1302 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1316 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.