# Llama 13b vs Nova 2 Lite

> Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-nova-2-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova 2 Lite leads 54.1 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 39.0 |
| Rank | 344 | 161 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Nova 2 Lite: 40.1 (#131)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1386 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Nova 2 Lite: 23.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Nova 2 Lite: 26.4 (#120)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1364 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Nova 2 Lite: 34.8 (#154)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1359 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Nova 2 Lite: 42.5 (#88)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Nova 2 Lite: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Nova 2 Lite: 47.3 (#148)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1364 |
| LMArena French | — | 1381 |
| LMArena German | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Nova 2 Lite: 70.7 (#156)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1335 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#145)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1335 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Nova 2 Lite: 54.1 (#150)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1362 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1291 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1338 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Nova 2 Lite share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.