# Llama 13b vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 21.4.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 348 | 244 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.