# Llama 13b vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.6 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 49.8 |
| Rank | 344 | 44 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1497 |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1532 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1490 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 155.18 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1485 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1304 |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1479 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1494 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1466 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1444 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1504 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.