# Llama 13b vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.6 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 49.9 |
| Rank | 344 | 43 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1497 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1486 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 154.32 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1477 |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1292 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1471 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1457 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1484 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.