# Llama 13b vs MiniMax-M2

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.3 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 344 | 201 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1350 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1336 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1314 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1367 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1329 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1332 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1362 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and MiniMax-M2 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.