# Llama 13b vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.5 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 344 | 177 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1410 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1432 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1405 |
| LMArena German | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1399 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.