# Llama 13b vs MiniMax M1

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.3 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 39.7 |
| Rank | 344 | 146 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1359 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1340 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1360 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1316 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1361 |
| LMArena French | — | 1369 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1335 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and MiniMax M1 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.