# Llama 13b vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.9 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 344 | 137 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.