# Llama 13b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 348 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.