# Llama 13b vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

> Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-llama2-70b-steerlm-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.6 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 348 | 268 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1025 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1047 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1072 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1063 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1060 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1058 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.