# Llama 13b vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Llama 3.2 3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 56.3 to 36.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 28.4 |
| Rank | 344 | 318 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1095 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1126 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1094 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1105 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Llama 3.2 3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Llama 3.2 3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.1 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Llama 3.2 3B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.