# Llama 13b vs Llama 3.2 1B

> Llama 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 24.4 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-llama-3-2-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 13b leads 26.7 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 20.1 |
| Rank | 348 | 354 |
| Context | — | 60K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.027 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1070 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1044 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | 101.99 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1086 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1007 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 959 |
| LMArena German | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 941 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1050 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Llama 3.2 1B?

Llama 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 24.4 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (21.4 vs 21.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Llama 3.2 1B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.