# Llama 13b vs Llama 2-70B

> Llama 13b and Llama 2-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (23.9 vs 24.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-70B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 2-70B leads 32.5 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 24.1 |
| Rank | 344 | 343 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1079 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1073 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | 64.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | 113.59 |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | 78.9% |
| PIQA | 80.1% | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | 73% | 80.2% |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1091 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | 69.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | 88.6% |
| MMLU | 47.7% | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | 87.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 2-70B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 994 |
| LMArena French | — | 1089 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Llama 2-70B?

Llama 13b and Llama 2-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (23.9 vs 24.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 13b or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Llama 2-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.8 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Llama 2-70B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.