# Laguna M.1 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 34.9 to 20.3.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 252 | 180 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | 15.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1359 |

## Multilingual

- Laguna M.1: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1372 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Laguna M.1: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Laguna M.1: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Laguna M.1: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.