# Laguna M.1 vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 40.1 to 36.4.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 252 | — |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.