# Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 38.3 to 21.1.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 256 | 156 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.