# Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 32B leads 39.7 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 256 | 172 |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1358 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1334 |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1399 |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |

## Multilingual

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |

## Instruction Following

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |

## Writing & Preference

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3 32B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.