# Laguna M.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

> Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-qwen2-5-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.6 to 33.2.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 256 | 267 |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $5.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |

## Multilingual

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena French | — | 1280 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1256 |

## Instruction Following

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1254 |

## Long Context

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1282 |

## Writing & Preference

- Laguna M.1: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1272 |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.