# Laguna M.1 vs Phi-4 Mini

> Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.6 to 28.1.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 256 | 283 |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Phi-4 Mini?

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.