# Laguna M.1 vs Phi-3.5-mini

> Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-phi-3-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 36.4 |
| Rank | 252 | — |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)
- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 78% |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.