# Laguna M.1 vs Phi-1.5

> Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-phi-1-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | — |
| Rank | 256 | — |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 91.53 |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Phi-1.5?

Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Phi-1.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.