# Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 36.3 to 21.1.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 256 | 191 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Laguna M.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |

## Instruction Following

- Laguna M.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Laguna M.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Laguna M.1: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.