# Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 41.4 to 36.4.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 252 | 188 |
| Context | 262K | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Laguna M.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.84 |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1443 |

## Multilingual

- Laguna M.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1439 |
| LMArena French | — | 1422 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Laguna M.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Laguna M.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Laguna M.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1413 |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Laguna M.1 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.