# Laguna M.1 vs Llama 3.2 1B

> Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-llama-3-2-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.6 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 60K.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 20.1 |
| Rank | 256 | 354 |
| Context | 262K | 60K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.027 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1070 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1044 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 101.99 |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1086 |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1007 |

## Multilingual

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 959 |
| LMArena German | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 941 |

## Instruction Following

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1050 |

## Writing & Preference

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1033 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1030 |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 3.2 1B?

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 60K.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 3.2 1B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.