# Laguna M.1 vs Llama 2-70B

> Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Laguna M.1 leads 21.1 to 8.1.

## Snapshot

| | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 256 | 349 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1079 |

## Reasoning

- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.79 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1091 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multilingual

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 995 |
| LMArena French | — | 1090 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Laguna M.1: —
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 2-70B?

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 2-70B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.