# Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Wizardlm 13b

> Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.5 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 134 | 272 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.57 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1018 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.02 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1017 |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1363 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | — |
| LMArena German | 1386 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1383 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1049 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1047 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Wizardlm 13b?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.