# Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 37.3.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.57 / $2.30 for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 140 | 72 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.57 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.30 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1460 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.01 | 147.37 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1397 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1365 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1387 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1386 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1348 | 1440 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1455 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1460 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) lists at $0.57 and $2.30.

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.