# Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.7 to 16.2.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 140 | 297 |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.57 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $2.30 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.01 | 128.52 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1397 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1365 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | — |
| LMArena French | 1379 | — |
| LMArena German | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1386 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 85% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1348 | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.