# Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.7 to 23.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 81.9% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 140 | 304 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.57 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.01 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1397 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | 31.6% |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1365 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | — |
| LMArena French | 1379 | — |
| LMArena German | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1386 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 85% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1348 | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 86.2% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.