# Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 36.9.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 134 | 63 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.57 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 1454 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1428 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.02 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1363 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1386 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1383 | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1403 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1415 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1414 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.