# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 31.4 to 21.7.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 63 | 229 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.