# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 70 | 336 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.