# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-phi-3-small-8k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.2 to 31.3.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 63 | 310 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1102 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1100 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1151 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1067 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1134 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | 1111 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1088 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.