# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 84.2% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 63 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and phi-3-medium 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.