# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs o3-mini

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-o3-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and o3-mini in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 45.5 to 27.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 84.2% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 77% for o3-mini.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 63 | 205 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- o3-mini: 41.4 (#116)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1378 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| SciCode | — | 39.8% |
| GSO | — | 1.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 82.7% |
| CadEval | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
- o3-mini: 29.3 (#79)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 22.5% |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- o3-mini: 16.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 17% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1366 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 34.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.6% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 70.6% |
| LMCA | — | 19% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 140.35 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.6 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.9% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- o3-mini: 27.6 (#236)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | 76.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 96.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 12.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- o3-mini: 38.3 (#135)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | 77% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1364 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.9% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- o3-mini: 45.9 (#159)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1379 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1333 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1303 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | 1286 |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | 1321 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- o3-mini: 75.3 (#67)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1338 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 84.4% |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- o3-mini: 33.8 (#251)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1343 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 50% |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- o3-mini: 50.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1337 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1320 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 61.7% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 50.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than o3-mini?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and o3-mini share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.